Quantcast
Go Search

Sponsored By: 
Page Edit Mode
 
Print This Article
Return To Article
Normal Text
Large Text

 SEC Won’t Pursue 12b-1 Reform 

Donohue says priority this year will be B/D and advisor regs 


3/26/2009 

Comment on This Article

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 3/27/2009 3:38:37 PM
    • Ralph Mitchell
    • We Need a UNION !!!
    • As an Independent Financial Advisor I am always seeing "unseen" hands that try and pick our pockets by either creating additional Fees that we must pay, inflating the costs of E&O coverage, or by trying to reduce our stream of sales commissions. The more that I look at the Financial Services Industry, the more than I think it may be time for us rise up and unionize. If workers in other industries had to undergo so much scrutiny for so little direct compensation, there would be strikes and lawsuits galore! Maybe it is time that we formed our own union and directly confronted our B/D firms, FINRA , the SEC and maybe even Capital Hill so that they all show us more respect and better compensation. Only an organized union will truly protect the interests of individual producers while others are trying to "pick our pockets".
    • 3/28/2009 10:39:38 AM
    • Todd Bright
    • 12b-1
    • The SEC should consider expanding the use of 12b-1fees in Class C Shares and consider eliminating all other classes, especially the transaction minded Class A class which many compliance offices deem the "best" option for the consumer. Class C shares with breakpoints determined at the B/D level would be an option. The mutual fund industry would then merely "manufacture" a fund and eliminate its role in the class of shares.

(c) Copyright Investment Advisor. A Summit Business Media publication. All Rights Reserved.  |  www.summitbusinessmedia.com